4:4:4 10bit single CMOS HD project

Régine Weinberg · December 29th, 2004, 01:28 PM

Dear Obin and all
Have a happy new year
2005
there is anywhere at tkodak, I do mean the page
a page that tells you exat all, all film formats.
I do remember it was on a page scanning film.

Jason Rodriguez · December 30th, 2004, 04:54 PM

Hi-Res Conforms in After Effects

Hey guys, you might want to check out this tutorial from Automatic duck using FCP and AE (and you should be able to do this with premiere or AVID)

http://www.automaticduck.com/product...esConformInAE/

Richard Mellor · December 30th, 2004, 05:10 PM

that looks like great news.

would love to see a premiere pro 1.5 tutorial

Obin Olson · December 31st, 2004, 07:55 AM

FCP box is in but at the moment I have to edit some scenes from a feature film on it...when the rush is done with that I will do some tests..sorry for the wait I am as anxious as any of you guys to try FCP with SheerVideo ;)

Richard Mellor · December 31st, 2004, 12:23 PM

It,s hard for me to change platforms when pc,s are becoming so cheap

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...6494&CatId=120

I built a g5 with the same specs ,and It was double the price.
I just can't afford to go the mac route.

*our static adapter is almost perfected and is priced right for the starving artist. with a street price of less than $150
and free 24 hour support on this board.

Aaron Shaw · December 31st, 2004, 12:55 PM

Good news Richard. Can you provide some detailed info on this adapter?

Richard Mellor · December 31st, 2004, 01:09 PM

I have sent chris a picture of the completed thorlabs adapter, and I will provide a link when he gets It. I hope obin trys this on his camera ,with cris rubin,s workflow to remove the grain from the groundglass . he thinks it will work even better with a uncompressed image, the parts list is less than $150.
the parts are thorlabs tube and opto sigma glass.
and c-mout to your choice of 35mm lens.

I really don't think this is off topic ,if this works we will be
adding to obin,s camera a$35,000 attachment for less thah $150

Obin Olson · January 2nd, 2005, 09:55 AM

still waiting for the 64bit capture card from Epix..they are telling me before the end of Jan. I will see a card in my mailbox....can't wait! that card will allow our whole system to shoot 10bit 1080P video @ 24fps

Jason Fox · January 2nd, 2005, 09:34 PM

So how goes the static adapter development? I've been looking at one posted at http://www.enormousapparatus.com, but I can't get any responses from the filmmaker about his gear.

Fox

Wayne Morellini · January 3rd, 2005, 05:48 AM

How is the motherboard and processing situation going.

I have to replace my motherboard, and I might as well think about replacing it with something that can be used for the camera, maybe even those sub $500 laptops.

So what is the latest on mainboard, drives, gigabit ethernet, processing power for 720p 1080p?

Obin Olson · January 4th, 2005, 06:05 PM

We are now moving the image preview/display off the CPU and into the GPU of our motherboard...this will allow much more CPU time for other things like Histogram etc in realtime..not to mention the use of a lower-cost slower CPU if we want..this work is being done as I speak and we are still awaiting the 64bit card for capture of the native raw 10bit 1080p footage..any day now...64bit ...arrgg I hate waiting !!

I am also looking at Dan's GG as an adaptor to be built into the camera as one whole system...all you do is choose your 35mm lens you want on the front..not sure yet if Dan's adaptor is going to work but I may have one here for testing soon

I am now thinking that I may just downsize the 1080P image after capture to 720p because workflow with 720 would be much easer then 1080p..thoughts anyone?

Aaron Shaw · January 4th, 2005, 06:14 PM

Might be worthwhile but then you won't be working with the raw files much for editing I would hope. You would definitely need to do an online-offline edit.

Joshua Starnes · January 4th, 2005, 06:48 PM

<<<-- Originally posted by Obin Olson : I am now thinking that I may just downsize the 1080P image after capture to 720p because workflow with 720 would be much easer then 1080p..thoughts anyone? -->>>

I think that's a good idea. Certainly, it would make it easier on editor's that don't have a system or monitor that can handle 1080p.

And then go back to the 1080p for online edit and color correction?

That being said, if you're going to be using this for feature film photography - you might be just as well of down converting to SD for your offline. There's no reason to take up a lot of space or mess with large render times if you're going to have to do an online edit later anyway.

That was always my intention. Capture in 1080p. Cut in 480p. Then go back and do an online, color correction, titles, etc.

Richard Mellor · January 4th, 2005, 09:12 PM

hi everyone: I have started a new thread with complete
parts list, and photo for the 35mm adapter.

Rob Lohman · January 5th, 2005, 03:46 AM

And here is the link to that new thread:

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...threadid=37296

December 30th, 2004, 05:10 PM	#2343
Richard Mellor Major Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: cambridge ma Posts: 247	high def that looks like great news. would love to see a premiere pro 1.5 tutorial

December 31st, 2004, 01:09 PM	#2347
Richard Mellor Major Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: cambridge ma Posts: 247	static adapter I have sent chris a picture of the completed thorlabs adapter, and I will provide a link when he gets It. I hope obin trys this on his camera ,with cris rubin,s workflow to remove the grain from the groundglass . he thinks it will work even better with a uncompressed image, the parts list is less than $150. the parts are thorlabs tube and opto sigma glass. and c-mout to your choice of 35mm lens. I really don't think this is off topic ,if this works we will be adding to obin,s camera a$35,000 attachment for less thah $150

January 4th, 2005, 09:12 PM	#2354
Richard Mellor Major Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: cambridge ma Posts: 247	35mm adapter parts list hi everyone: I have started a new thread with complete parts list, and photo for the 35mm adapter.

January 5th, 2005, 03:46 AM	#2355
Rob Lohman RED Code Chef Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Holland Posts: 12,514	And here is the link to that new thread: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...threadid=37296 __________________ Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge \| Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers \| Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors

December 29th, 2004, 01:28 PM	#2341
Régine Weinberg Major Player Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Bordeaux, going to Bangkok, 2011 Posts: 232	Dear Obin and all Have a happy new year 2005 there is anywhere at tkodak, I do mean the page a page that tells you exat all, all film formats. I do remember it was on a page scanning film.

December 30th, 2004, 04:54 PM	#2342
Jason Rodriguez Trustee Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Virginia Beach, VA Posts: 1,095	Hi-Res Conforms in After Effects Hey guys, you might want to check out this tutorial from Automatic duck using FCP and AE (and you should be able to do this with premiere or AVID) http://www.automaticduck.com/product...esConformInAE/

December 31st, 2004, 07:55 AM	#2344
Obin Olson Trustee Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Wilmington NC Posts: 1,414	FCP box is in but at the moment I have to edit some scenes from a feature film on it...when the rush is done with that I will do some tests..sorry for the wait I am as anxious as any of you guys to try FCP with SheerVideo ;)

December 31st, 2004, 12:23 PM	#2345
Richard Mellor Major Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: cambridge ma Posts: 247	It,s hard for me to change platforms when pc,s are becoming so cheap http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...6494&CatId=120 I built a g5 with the same specs ,and It was double the price. I just can't afford to go the mac route. *our static adapter is almost perfected and is priced right for the starving artist. with a street price of less than $150 and free 24 hour support on this board.

December 31st, 2004, 12:55 PM	#2346
Aaron Shaw Major Player Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 587	Good news Richard. Can you provide some detailed info on this adapter?

January 2nd, 2005, 09:55 AM	#2348
Obin Olson Trustee Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Wilmington NC Posts: 1,414	still waiting for the 64bit capture card from Epix..they are telling me before the end of Jan. I will see a card in my mailbox....can't wait! that card will allow our whole system to shoot 10bit 1080P video @ 24fps

January 2nd, 2005, 09:34 PM	#2349
Jason Fox Regular Crew Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 37	So how goes the static adapter development? I've been looking at one posted at http://www.enormousapparatus.com, but I can't get any responses from the filmmaker about his gear. Fox

January 3rd, 2005, 05:48 AM	#2350
Wayne Morellini Inner Circle Join Date: May 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 2,762	How is the motherboard and processing situation going. I have to replace my motherboard, and I might as well think about replacing it with something that can be used for the camera, maybe even those sub $500 laptops. So what is the latest on mainboard, drives, gigabit ethernet, processing power for 720p 1080p?

January 4th, 2005, 06:05 PM	#2351
Obin Olson Trustee Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Wilmington NC Posts: 1,414	We are now moving the image preview/display off the CPU and into the GPU of our motherboard...this will allow much more CPU time for other things like Histogram etc in realtime..not to mention the use of a lower-cost slower CPU if we want..this work is being done as I speak and we are still awaiting the 64bit card for capture of the native raw 10bit 1080p footage..any day now...64bit ...arrgg I hate waiting !! I am also looking at Dan's GG as an adaptor to be built into the camera as one whole system...all you do is choose your 35mm lens you want on the front..not sure yet if Dan's adaptor is going to work but I may have one here for testing soon I am now thinking that I may just downsize the 1080P image after capture to 720p because workflow with 720 would be much easer then 1080p..thoughts anyone?

January 4th, 2005, 06:14 PM	#2352
Aaron Shaw Major Player Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 587	Might be worthwhile but then you won't be working with the raw files much for editing I would hope. You would definitely need to do an online-offline edit.

January 4th, 2005, 06:48 PM	#2353
Joshua Starnes Major Player Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 356	<<<-- Originally posted by Obin Olson : I am now thinking that I may just downsize the 1080P image after capture to 720p because workflow with 720 would be much easer then 1080p..thoughts anyone? -->>> I think that's a good idea. Certainly, it would make it easier on editor's that don't have a system or monitor that can handle 1080p. And then go back to the 1080p for online edit and color correction? That being said, if you're going to be using this for feature film photography - you might be just as well of down converting to SD for your offline. There's no reason to take up a lot of space or mess with large render times if you're going to have to do an online edit later anyway. That was always my intention. Capture in 1080p. Cut in 480p. Then go back and do an online, color correction, titles, etc.