![]() |
Stereo vs 2 Channel
At the risk of sounding like a dumb question, can someone tell me what the difference is between recording with a stereo shotgun microphone vs recording with 2 mono mics on separate camera channels?
|
Quote:
|
Thanks Steve, good explanation.
|
Actually, the most important factor is probably in the physical arrangement of the two mics (and the exact specs of the two mics used). Stereo mics (or stereo techniques with two separate mics) involve mic capsules that are carefully chosen for how their frequency response and pickup patterns interact, and placed in a very specific configuration that allows them to capture spatial information.
Two channel just means you're recording using two sound-gathering devices - often placed on different sources. Stereo means you're using 1 specifically-configured 2-channel sound-gathering device, both aiming to capture the same sound source. Stereo shotguns are not the best approach to stereo! You can get a much better stereo image using a good pair of microphones in a proper configuration than you'd get from a stereo shotgun. You can also use non-shotgun stereo mics to better effect. What are you trying to record? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks for the input. |
Quote:
Regards, Ty Ford |
Bob, to clarify a bit more--
In the most common usage, especially around here, the word stereo means recreating the sense of relative placement of sounds a single head would hear at a point in the room--a stereo image. But two mics that provide different signals two the two channels, directional mics pointed differently or nondirectonal mics located differently, can often give a spacious and pleasing sound. I don't think you're wrong to call that stereo sound in the dictionary sense. You wouldn't get a true stereo image, but that is probably not important for a wedding reception. But for recording a stage concert, you might want to take two directional mics, say cardioid pattern mics, line them up with one directly below the other pointed at the stage, then rotate them while keeping the front ends lined up so that one points toward the front left and the other toward the front right. They still receive the same sound waves at the same time over all frequencies, but each one's response is strongest in the direction it's pointed. Meanwhile, the response of each mic to the sounds coming from the front center is weaker, BUT it's heard from both speakers on playback. The relative loudness and locations of the sounds, aka the stereo soundfield, is reasonably reproduced. This arrangement of mics is called the x-y coincident pair. A lot of stereo mics use a pair of fixed X-y coincident elements, but in return for the convenience you trade away the flexibility of being able to change the angle to get the balance you want. There are other arrangemets that reproduce the soundfield also. |
Quote:
Just semantics... but even when I'm using a spaced pair, or a Decca Tree, I consider the whole setup to be one stereo device, because of the various types of constraints (on mic matching, placement, levels, etc.) that tie the system together. MENTALLY, I mean, a stereo pair is a single device working on 1 consistent image, while "2 mics" can also be 2 unrelated devices working on 2 unrelated images. |
Then there's creating a stereo image with non-symetrical mics; like using a Schoeps CMC641 and a Neumann U 89 on the top and bottom bouts of an acoustic guitar, respectively. Semantics preclude some from calling this "stereo" due the dissimilar mics, but the stereo field created can be quite nice.
Regards, Ty Ford |
Quote:
|
the 835ST is EITHER a stero mic OR a shotgun. Not both at the same time.
Ty Ford |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The more stereo you have the less rejection you have, by definition. ' Regards, Ty Ford |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network