![]() |
Another consumer level 3D camera
2 Attachment(s)
It's only SD but I'm sure it will sell well at $600. At least the IO is really small so it will be difficult for the naïve consumer-level user to screw up (unlike Fujifilm's 77mm IO.)
Quote:
|
Have you seen the announcement from Aiptek about their stereoscopic 720P camera? For $230?
|
Quote:
|
And I see our friends at B&H http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/702977-REG/Aiptek_3D_HD_3D_HD_720p_Camcorder.html to be available this month.
|
I've messed about with a couple of Aiptek's HD camcorders and the image quality was absolutely terrible. You get what you pay for, in other words.
Check out this test, select 720p, open the 3D pop-up menu and select left or right eye only. That looks pretty ghastly to me. |
Quote:
I do not expect great quality from a consumer camcorder with just one 1/3.5" CMOS (well, one for each eye). But it is hard to judge the quality based on YouTube. For one, before uploading, the 3D YouTuber has to reduce the width of the image by one half, then encode the result. After the upload, YouTube will re-encode it to a low bitrate file. So there are three steps, each potentially degrading the quality of the image. Of course, if you have actually tested the camera yourself and the results were no better than that, yes, you get what you paid for. But consumers will probably still be pleased with it. Then again, it would be interesting to see the quality of the video coming out of its HDMI port and recorded by a nanoFlash. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
YouTube - jcicui's Channel has a whole bunch of Aiptek test clips. Though I do not understand where all these tests are coming from if the camera is not quite in the stores yet.
|
Guerrilla marketing, Adam. Could be someone who works for Aiptek or someone external they hired to shoot demo clips.
|
Yes, I suppose. But there are clips on several different YouTube accounts, some well done (like the ones I mentioned), some quite amateurish (like the one you mentioned). And all seem to have low quality video (as you mentioned), which is not exactly a strong marketing point (though, as I said, as a consumer camera at that price it is not too shabby). Surely, marketers would control the lighting better if nothing else.
|
Sorry but the Aiptek I had once was not worth the money I paid for it. The pictures were so poor I used it once to check it out and could not stand the skew, grain and noise. It doesn't matter how cheap it is if it's so poor you can't or don't want to use it.
|
Thanks, Alister. That settles it for me.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network