December 21st, 2013, 07:20 PM | #46 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
Quote:
One thing, though; every time I look at a picture of those legs I find it hard to imagine them not flexing badly. They look so thin. Quote:
|
|||
December 21st, 2013, 07:25 PM | #47 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
Thanks again for your contributions. |
|
December 21st, 2013, 11:34 PM | #48 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 626
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Hi Michael,
Here are some pictures of TraillPod Mark 3 that I described in an earlier post. It is set-up in low mode. Total weight including TM 900 is ~ 3.6 kg. Each leg has a fixed length for both stiffness and simplicity. The angles that the legs make to one another are fixed but height can be adjusted by repositioning the clamp block. As mentioned the legs have different diameters and telescope one into the other forming a ‘staff’. The last picture shows the set-up partly dismantled. Everything can be removed. http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/images/a...1&d=1387690130 |
December 22nd, 2013, 06:15 PM | #49 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Nicely made setup. Good to see someone else who likes making their own accessories.
|
December 22nd, 2013, 06:16 PM | #50 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
|
|
December 27th, 2013, 10:03 PM | #51 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
You are buying a beautiful high build quality side mount head with a decent length QR plate. Why add the weight of the Manfrotto plate? Just get more Sachtler QR plates.
|
December 27th, 2013, 10:16 PM | #52 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
My problem (which I feel must surely be quite common) is that I want to be able to take the camera off the tripod and mount it on a stabilizer (and other mounts I might possibly invent in the future), so I need a QR bracket that takes the same plate as the head. According to Chris, the Manfrotto plate and bracket are compatible with the Sachtler FSB4 and FSB6. I sent an email to Miller asking if there was a solution to this for their tripods, either from them or another manufacturer, but have not had a reply yet. I guess they are closed until some time in the new year. |
|
December 29th, 2013, 08:59 AM | #53 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whidbey Island
Posts: 873
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
|
December 29th, 2013, 02:54 PM | #54 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
LOL! Excellent! Thanks, Mark. :)
|
January 12th, 2014, 10:44 PM | #55 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
Special mounts: QR Adaptor Plate (313) - Miller Camera Support So that's another point in Miller's favour. I had a good long talk to someone at an Australian store, and when I described the old Miller heads I used to use 30 years ago he said the modern ones are very different. I came away not knowing what to think. But I assume the basic design of all this range of heads is very similar. So the questions are: Is the Gitzo CF legs + FSB4 better than the Miller Solo CF and DS10 head? Especially considering it will cost me nearly $600 more. Will a head that lists a weight range of 2.5kg to 5kg be completely unusable with only a 1.5kg camera? If so, then I may as well wait until I get the camera I intend using. The reason I wanted to get the tripod sooner is because I'm sick of fighting with my current system, but if I will still have to fight with the new one I may as well wait. |
|
January 12th, 2014, 11:06 PM | #56 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
The Gitzo / Sachtler FSB combination is superb. If you bought it, you would be happy. Very happy. Day after day.
Is it worth the extra cost, for you? I cannot say. |
January 13th, 2014, 12:00 AM | #57 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
Spec wise, nothing jumps out at me as being that much better, if at all. |
|
January 13th, 2014, 12:57 PM | #58 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
The value (to me) of the Gitzo / Sachtler combo is not in the specs - it is in the handling, and the rock solid foundation, and in the perfect pans with no wind-up or backlash, and the quality of the build. These items are not found in specs.
However, the Miller combo might be just fine, and the price difference is significant. It is unfortunate that you can't see and try both in person. Alas, I am of no further help. I wish you well in your decision. |
January 13th, 2014, 02:40 PM | #59 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
These 2 systems are much closer in price at B&H. What makes the Miller so attractive is that there is a store in Australia that has it for a very good price with free shipping until the end of January. Thanks for all your input. |
|
January 13th, 2014, 04:21 PM | #60 |
Inner Circle
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Seems this thread has done significantly more than its allotted laps, tho' guess that was inevitable given its title, there being no such critter and all.
Back to basics. Existing scenario: Exceedingly average sticks + ditto head + 600 mm lens = exceedingly average video + totally shagged Currently Proposed Scenario: 1:1:1:? sticks + untried head + 600 mm lens = who the heck knows (but you wouldn't catch me using it for a parachute). Reality Check Scenario: Vinten Vb (x) tester 2:2:1 sticks & head combo + Manfrotto 520ball + Manfrotto 128LP exceedingly average head + 600 mm lens = well, at least there's some decent sticks under it, take it from there. Logic: 1. Both of the first two components of the CPS are potential "buy it and weep" units, not a good look. 2. The sticks under the Vb series are darn good, and they're FREE testers! 3. You need a 520BALL 75Mm Bowl With Knob 520BALL - Other | Manfrotto to use your current head with any 75 mm bowl sticks anyway. 4. If the RCS doesn't work (as if!), send the Vinten back with thanks, but........and we take this thread for a couple of additional laps and see if we can kill it. CS |
| ||||||
|
|