|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 18th, 2007, 03:27 AM | #1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Deadliest Catch: How many Z1Us sacrificed?
Just watched a bit of the Behind the Scenes special of Deadliest Catch and I hear that most of the Z1Us used all go beyond repair once they're back at Dutch Harbor. They start with 50, now I wonder, how many Z1Us were lost to the tough conditions of the Bering Sea?
Attached are screenshots of some of the busted ones. However, I need an exact #. |
December 18th, 2007, 10:04 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
|
I read an article that said they lose about 2/3 of them.
|
December 18th, 2007, 11:03 AM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
That's a lot! Around 33 lost out of 50... that's like around $132000 or more of done away money! Enough for a low-end Apartment!
But what's the exact number? |
December 18th, 2007, 11:07 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,609
|
why not contact the production company and ask them. I *think* it's Pilligran Productions or maybe Pilgrim Productions in LA
Also on the website if it's still there under discovery.com there might be a lead to the production company or there might be something about the info you want on the message board again, if it's still there. Don |
December 18th, 2007, 11:34 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
|
The production company is based in Santa Monica ,CA if that helps, I can't remember the name.
|
December 18th, 2007, 01:17 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 439
|
Original Productions. They just struck a pretty major deal with NBC, detalils are floating around in the New York Times.
|
December 18th, 2007, 01:24 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
|
|
December 18th, 2007, 02:07 PM | #8 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
That's pretty interesting. The photos above remind me of this: http://www.camcorderservice.nl/sony_fx1.htm
|
December 18th, 2007, 11:12 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
It's probably 50 out of 50, I'm guessing they get a REALLY sweet bulk discount, or maybe even some sort of endorsement... yeah, it's expensive, but I doubt many of these cams come back serviceable by those pix... doubtful even usable as parts with all the salt water!
In budgetary terms for a series, that's probably peanuts - supposedly reality series are cheap to produce in the first place compared to a sitcom or traditional series with "stars"... the Z1 budget wouldn't even buy 1/10th of a "Friend", and probably Seinfelds left toe or something... |
December 19th, 2007, 02:06 AM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 392
|
Quote:
|
|
December 19th, 2007, 05:02 AM | #11 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Quote:
But not all cameras were on deck, the Capitan cameras didn't get any water in them. Only banged up if the waves are really big and the cameraguy was unstable. |
|
December 19th, 2007, 01:59 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 528
|
Deadliest Catch is one of Discovery's most popular shows, I'm sure they're making up the cost of that in a couple of commercials.....
|
December 19th, 2007, 05:48 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Still, it isn't really economical.
|
December 20th, 2007, 01:27 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 528
|
Well, Jack, you're talking about a show that makes millions for the network. They need a camera that's going to produce an acceptable picture for Discovery while still having professional features. You're not going to find a HDV camera with the features and size the z1u has for less.
I would say it looks like they are being about as economical as they can be....... Could have been XDCAMs in the pics..... |
December 20th, 2007, 10:40 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
|
How do you figure?
It's the cheapest camera that produces the image quality that Discovery demands. Considering the shooting conditions you're gonna lose 2/3 of them. I'd say the production company is being very economical, considering the conditions, and the quality of the final product. |
| ||||||
|
|