Deadliest Catch: How many Z1Us sacrificed? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > And Now, For Something Completely Different... > The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media
Let's talk about anything media related.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 18th, 2007, 03:27 AM   #1
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
Deadliest Catch: How many Z1Us sacrificed?

Just watched a bit of the Behind the Scenes special of Deadliest Catch and I hear that most of the Z1Us used all go beyond repair once they're back at Dutch Harbor. They start with 50, now I wonder, how many Z1Us were lost to the tough conditions of the Bering Sea?

Attached are screenshots of some of the busted ones. However, I need an exact #.
Attached Thumbnails
Deadliest Catch: How many Z1Us sacrificed?-bustedz1usdcatch.png   Deadliest Catch: How many Z1Us sacrificed?-bustedz1usdcatch2.png  

Deadliest Catch: How many Z1Us sacrificed?-bustedz1usdcatch3.png   Deadliest Catch: How many Z1Us sacrificed?-bustedz1usdcatch4.png  

Deadliest Catch: How many Z1Us sacrificed?-bustedz1usdcatch5.png  
Jack Zhang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 10:04 AM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
I read an article that said they lose about 2/3 of them.
__________________
Mark
www.sharkvp.com
Mark Bournes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 11:03 AM   #3
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
That's a lot! Around 33 lost out of 50... that's like around $132000 or more of done away money! Enough for a low-end Apartment!

But what's the exact number?
Jack Zhang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 11:07 AM   #4
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,609
why not contact the production company and ask them. I *think* it's Pilligran Productions or maybe Pilgrim Productions in LA
Also on the website if it's still there under discovery.com there might be a lead to the production company or there might be something about the info you want on the message board again, if it's still there.

Don
Don Bloom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 11:34 AM   #5
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
The production company is based in Santa Monica ,CA if that helps, I can't remember the name.
__________________
Mark
www.sharkvp.com
Mark Bournes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 01:17 PM   #6
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 439
Original Productions. They just struck a pretty major deal with NBC, detalils are floating around in the New York Times.
Jaron Berman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 01:24 PM   #7
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/...LIFE/704030328

This is the article I was refering to.
__________________
Mark
www.sharkvp.com
Mark Bournes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 02:07 PM   #8
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
That's pretty interesting. The photos above remind me of this: http://www.camcorderservice.nl/sony_fx1.htm
Boyd Ostroff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 11:12 PM   #9
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
It's probably 50 out of 50, I'm guessing they get a REALLY sweet bulk discount, or maybe even some sort of endorsement... yeah, it's expensive, but I doubt many of these cams come back serviceable by those pix... doubtful even usable as parts with all the salt water!

In budgetary terms for a series, that's probably peanuts - supposedly reality series are cheap to produce in the first place compared to a sitcom or traditional series with "stars"... the Z1 budget wouldn't even buy 1/10th of a "Friend", and probably Seinfelds left toe or something...
Dave Blackhurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2007, 02:06 AM   #10
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boyd Ostroff View Post
That's pretty interesting. The photos above remind me of this: http://www.camcorderservice.nl/sony_fx1.htm
Oh...thats just not right...
Alan Ortiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2007, 05:02 AM   #11
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
Quote:
doubtful even usable as parts with all the salt water!
Not only that, some of the rigged cameras froze over in ice inside a waterproof casing on icy days.

But not all cameras were on deck, the Capitan cameras didn't get any water in them. Only banged up if the waves are really big and the cameraguy was unstable.
Jack Zhang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2007, 01:59 PM   #12
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Zhang View Post
That's a lot! Around 33 lost out of 50... that's like around $132000 or more of done away money! Enough for a low-end Apartment!

But what's the exact number?
Deadliest Catch is one of Discovery's most popular shows, I'm sure they're making up the cost of that in a couple of commercials.....
Kit Hannah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2007, 05:48 PM   #13
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
Still, it isn't really economical.
Jack Zhang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2007, 01:27 AM   #14
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Zhang View Post
Still, it isn't really economical.
Well, Jack, you're talking about a show that makes millions for the network. They need a camera that's going to produce an acceptable picture for Discovery while still having professional features. You're not going to find a HDV camera with the features and size the z1u has for less.

I would say it looks like they are being about as economical as they can be....... Could have been XDCAMs in the pics.....
Kit Hannah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2007, 10:40 AM   #15
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Zhang View Post
Still, it isn't really economical.
How do you figure?

It's the cheapest camera that produces the image quality that Discovery demands. Considering the shooting conditions you're gonna lose 2/3 of them.

I'd say the production company is being very economical, considering the conditions, and the quality of the final product.
__________________
Mark
www.sharkvp.com
Mark Bournes is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > And Now, For Something Completely Different... > The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network