|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 1st, 2009, 11:54 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 17
|
Micro/Macro lenses on EX3
I would like to use my ex3 for close-ups of plants and insects and get a Nikon micro lens for this purpose, attached to an "Adaptimax"
adapter. Can anyone please recommend me what type of Nikon lenses are suitable for this? Also any general advice regarding micro/macro photography in general would be most welcome since I have limited knowledge about these types of lenses, many thanks, Jan |
June 1st, 2009, 01:03 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
All of the micro Nikons, MF and AF, are good. The old 55 f2.8 micro is one of the sharpest lenses ever made IMHO. For plants a 55mm would be good, but for insects a 105mm might be better, or even a 200mm micro (though these are pretty big).
Sigma also makes some good macros, as does Tamron. Ideally you want one that gives 1:1 life-size, some only go to half life-size. Steve |
June 1st, 2009, 01:54 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chislehurst, London
Posts: 1,724
|
I use the 55mm f2.8 Micro Nikkor together with Steve's new Adaptimax adaptor and can vouch for the excellent quality. You will need to use it on a tripod as this combination gives a 5.4X magnification factor, i.e. the 55mm lens now becomes an effective 297mm lens. Set the lens at f8 or f11 for ultra sharp results.
__________________
Eyes are a deaf man’s ears. Ears are a blind man’s eyes |
June 1st, 2009, 02:24 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
Check ffordes photographic : Main Index They have a used Nikon 55mm f2.8 micro MF for £179.
Steve |
June 1st, 2009, 03:01 PM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 17
|
With the magnification factor taken into account,
would I be better of buying a "wide" micro lens? Still unclear how the magnification factor works on micro lenses, I know that with a tele lens in turns it into a super-tele lens, but how does it translate into the micro lenses? Will they still be proper micro lenses? All help and advice greatly appreciated, Jan |
June 1st, 2009, 03:49 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dorset UK
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
55mm Nikon Macro attached to PMW-EX3 via Adaptimax on Vimeo Not the greatest footage but you get the jist of it. There's some more telephoto footage on the Adaptimax website. Cheers Steve |
|
June 1st, 2009, 07:50 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wayne, PA
Posts: 207
|
I like the 180mm
One of the many nice things about these adapters is they don't change the aperture or minimum focus distance. I recently used my 180mm about ten feet from the subject for some garden closeups (just playing with the lens).
Last edited by Denis OKeefe; June 1st, 2009 at 07:51 PM. Reason: typo |
June 3rd, 2009, 07:21 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Elverum Norway
Posts: 62
|
Zeiss
Im using Zeiss Planar 100 mm w/Macro and with Nikon adapter. It's a manual lens, kind of prime lens-.
|
June 3rd, 2009, 07:35 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chislehurst, London
Posts: 1,724
|
After reading this thread I used the Adaptimax adaptor together with the 55mm Micro Nikkor lens fitted to a Nikon Extension tube. The results were amazing. I will post some clips later.
I have been using Steve Shovlars Adaptimax Plus adaptor for a couple of weeks, this allows the use of all Niikor lenses, DX, G series as well as the older Ai and manual lenses. It's a nicely made adaptor at a reasonable price. I will be posting a full un-biased review on this adaptor shortly.
__________________
Eyes are a deaf man’s ears. Ears are a blind man’s eyes |
| ||||||
|
|